NewsAnarchist
The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
BREAKING
Independent investigative news — unfiltered, unspiked. The Buried Week publishes every Friday. Subscribe free for the daily briefing. Tips: zeno@newsanarchist.com or Signal. Independent investigative news — unfiltered, unspiked. The Buried Week publishes every Friday. Subscribe free for the daily briefing. Tips: zeno@newsanarchist.com or Signal.
Government Secrets

It’s easier for Californians to escape data brokers following a Markup investigation

Share

The Markup and CalMatters showed how website code could make it harder for Californians to exercise their right to remove personal data. Now much of that code has disappeared.

The Markup and CalMatters showed how website code could make it harder for Californians to exercise their right to remove personal data. Now much of that code has disappeared.

What the Documents Show

A person searching for how to delete their information from a data broker would find nothing. The legal right existed on paper. In practice, it vanished. The mechanism was deliberate. The "no-index" tag—a line of website code—serves no legitimate function for a deletion request page.

🔎 Mainstream angle
The corporate press either ignored this story entirely or buried it in a 3-sentence brief. The framing, when it appeared at all, focused on process rather than impact.

Follow the Money

It exists only to obstruct discovery. These companies weren't hiding poorly designed interfaces or burying requests under legitimate navigation structures. They were affirmatively telling search engines: do not let people find this. When The Markup and CalMatters published their findings and reached out to the companies involved, the response was swift. Twelve of the thirty-five brokers immediately removed the obstruction code. That's a critical detail: these corporations dropped the practice the moment external scrutiny became public.

What Else We Know

They didn't argue the code was necessary. They didn't claim misunderstanding. The remaining twenty-three companies continued the practice until further pressure materialized. New Hampshire Senator Maggie Hassan, ranking Democrat on the Senate Joint Economic Committee, sent letters to five major brokers—IQVIA Digital, Comscore, Telesign Corporation, 6sense Insights, and one unnamed fifth company. Four of these corporations engaged with the Senate investigation and agreed to make their deletion pages visible in search results. As of The Markup's follow-up review in May 2026, only eight of the original thirty-five companies were still hiding their pages.

Primary Sources

  • Source: The Markup
  • Category: True Crime
  • Cross-reference independently — don't take our word for it.
What are they not saying?
Who benefits from this story staying buried? Follow the regulatory filings, the court dockets, and the FOIA releases. The truth is in the paperwork — it always is.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist aggregates from public records, API feeds (Federal Register, CourtListener, MuckRock, Hacker News), and independent media. AI-assisted synthesis. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Share
Part of our Government Secrets coverage
See the full picture on our Government Secrets hub — including our ongoing coverage of declassification, whistleblowers, and government transparency.
How We Report Government Secrets

This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a declassified document, a FOIA release, an inspector general or congressional report, or a named whistleblower disclosure reported by outlets we cite) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it reports what the document or disclosure states and does not speculate about what remains classified beyond that. Part of our Government Secrets hub. Found an error? Tell us.