The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
Government Secrets

City & Guilds Bosses' Millions

City & Guilds bosses awarded themselves millions in bonuses without authorisation

Share
City & Guilds Bosses' Millions

An investigation has uncovered that bosses at City & Guilds, a prominent vocational education provider, awarded themselves millions in bonuses without proper authorisation. According to a report, Kirstie Donnelly and Abid Ismail, senior executives at the organisation, received significant bonus payments without the knowledge or approval of their superiors. The lack of transparency and oversight in the awarding of these bonuses has raised concerns about corporate governance and accountability within the organisation.

The investigation, which was reported on by The Guardian on June 15, 2026, found that the bonus payments were made to Donnelly and Ismail over a period of time, with the exact amounts not disclosed. However, it is understood that the payments ran into millions of pounds. The fact that these payments were made without proper authorisation or knowledge of superiors has sparked criticism and calls for greater transparency and accountability within the organisation.

City & Guilds is a well-established provider of vocational education and training, with strong links to the City of London Corporation. The corporation, which is responsible for governing the City of London, has a long history of involvement in education and has a number of prestigious schools and institutions under its jurisdiction. However, the corporation has also faced criticism in the past for its lack of transparency and accountability, with some arguing that its privileges and powers are not subject to sufficient public scrutiny.

The issue of executive pay and bonuses is a highly contentious one, particularly in the context of public or quasi-public organisations such as City & Guilds. The fact that senior executives at the organisation were able to award themselves millions in bonuses without proper authorisation or oversight has raised concerns about the lack of effective regulation and governance. As George Monbiot has argued in The Guardian, the City of London Corporation's power and influence can often undermine efforts to regulate the financial sector and curb excessive executive pay.

The investigation into the bonus payments at City & Guilds is likely to have significant implications for the organisation and its senior executives. The lack of transparency and accountability in the awarding of these bonuses has damaged the organisation's reputation and raised questions about its corporate governance. As the UK government continues to grapple with the issue of executive pay and bonuses, the case of City & Guilds serves as a reminder of the need for greater transparency and accountability in the corporate sector.

James Whitfield
The James Whitfield Take
Corporate Watchdog & Government Secrets — UK

As I reflect on the City & Guilds bosses' substantial remuneration packages, I firmly believe that their millions are a stark reminder of the inequality prevalent in our education system. My thesis is that the exorbitant salaries of these executives are unjustified and divert essential funds away from the actual provision of vocational training. If nothing changes, it is the City & Guilds bosses who will continue to win, whilst students and taxpayers are left to foot the bill, ultimately losing out on the opportunity for affordable and high-quality education.

Primary source: The Guardian
Cross-reference independently — do not take our word for it.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist uses AI-assisted reporting with web search. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Part of our Government Secrets coverage
See the full picture on our Government Secrets hub — including our ongoing coverage of declassification, whistleblowers, and government transparency.
How We Report Government Secrets

This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a declassified document, a FOIA release, an inspector general or congressional report, or a named whistleblower disclosure reported by outlets we cite) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it reports what the document or disclosure states and does not speculate about what remains classified beyond that. Part of our Government Secrets hub. Found an error? Tell us.

THE DAILY BRIEFING
Get the stories buried, spiked, or spun — free every morning.
No spam. No ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share