The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
Surveillance State

London Police Expand Facial Recognition

London police will extend their use of live facial recognition and drones, sparking concerns over growing surveillance powers

London Police Expand Facial Recognition

London's Metropolitan Police Service has announced plans to expand its use of live facial recognition technology, sparking concerns among civil liberties groups about the growing surveillance powers of law enforcement agencies, as reported by Canadian Affairs. The move is part of a broader trend of police forces increasingly relying on artificial intelligence, with more than a dozen states in the US having passed laws regulating related technologies such as facial recognition, drone surveillance, and automated license plate readers, according to a recent report on whsm.com. This development is consistent with the growth of police AI use, as discussed in the article Police AI Use Grows, which highlights the need for clearer regulations and guidelines on the use of these technologies.

The use of facial recognition technology has a history dating back to the early 1990s, when researchers relied heavily on large image databases drawn from mugshots and prison records, as noted in an article on gizmodo.com. Trevor Paglen's 2020 work, "They Took the Faces from the Accused and the Dead," also sheds light on the origins of modern facial-recognition research. The expansion of live facial recognition in London is expected to cost millions of dollars, although the exact figure has not been disclosed. Meanwhile, other countries are also grappling with issues related to data protection and surveillance, such as India, which is currently debating its India's Data Bill. In a related development, the online platform Discord has Discord Pauses Age Verification efforts, citing concerns about user privacy.

The decision to extend the use of live facial recognition has been met with criticism from rights groups, who argue that it poses a significant threat to individual privacy and civil liberties. The police, on the other hand, claim that the technology is essential to fighting crime and maintaining public safety. As the use of artificial intelligence and surveillance technologies continues to grow, it is likely that the debate over their use and regulation will only intensify. The lack of clear guidelines and regulations on the use of these technologies is a concern that needs to be addressed, as highlighted in recent reports on the growth of police AI use and the need for more stringent regulations.

Marcus Webb
The Marcus Webb Take
Surveillance State & Tech Privacy

As I reflect on the London Police expanding their use of facial recognition technology, I firmly believe that this move poses a significant threat to individual privacy and civil liberties. My thesis is that the unchecked expansion of facial recognition will erode trust between law enforcement and the public, ultimately undermining the very fabric of our society. If nothing changes, it is the technology companies and government agencies that will win, as they will have unparalleled access to personal data and surveillance capabilities, while the average citizen will be left to navigate a potentially Orwellian landscape.

Primary source: Canadian Affairs
Cross-reference independently — do not take our word for it.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist uses AI-assisted reporting with web search. Always verify primary sources linked above.

THE DAILY BRIEFING
Get the stories buried, spiked, or spun — free every morning.
No spam. No ads. Unsubscribe anytime.