The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
Surveillance State

Luna Hearing Reveals Unfulfilled Promises

MKULTRA victims still await justice and compensation decades after initial hearings

Luna Hearing Reveals Unfulfilled Promises

The recent Luna hearing has brought to light unfulfilled promises made by government officials, particularly with regards to the MKULTRA program, a CIA mind control project that was exposed in the 1970s. As reported by Mother Jones, a key promise made during the 1977 hearings into MKULTRA was that the victims of the program would be identified, compensated, and provided with lifetime medical care, a commitment that has yet to be fulfilled. This lack of action has left many victims and their families without the support they were promised, and has raised questions about the government's commitment to transparency and accountability.

The hearing, which was held to investigate the CIA's mind control program, was marked by controversy and disagreements among panel members, with some accusing the government of covering up the truth about the program. As noted in the Trump Task Force Gathers Intel article, the government has a history of withholding information and blocking disclosure, a trend that continues to this day. The MKULTRA program, which was established in the 1950s, involved the use of mind control techniques, including hypnosis and LSD, on unsuspecting subjects, and has been the subject of numerous investigations and lawsuits over the years.

Despite the promises made by government officials, many victims of the MKULTRA program are still awaiting justice, as reported in the MKULTRA Victims Await Justice article. The program, which was funded by the CIA and involved the participation of numerous government agencies and private companies, has been estimated to have cost taxpayers millions of dollars, with some estimates as high as $10 million per year. The government's failure to provide compensation and medical care to the victims of the program has been widely criticized, and has raised questions about the government's commitment to protecting the rights and well-being of its citizens.

The Luna hearing has also highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in government, particularly with regards to classified programs and intelligence agencies. As noted on the state.gov website, the government has a responsibility to provide accurate and timely information to the public, and to ensure that its actions are transparent and accountable. However, as reported on govexec.com, the government's track record on transparency and accountability has been mixed, with many agencies and programs continuing to operate in secrecy. The development of AI Bias Law may help to address some of these issues, but more needs to be done to ensure that the government is transparent and accountable to the public.

Jordan Calloway
The Jordan Calloway Take
Government Secrets & FOIA

As I reflect on the Luna hearing, I am reminded of the unfulfilled promises that have left our community in a state of uncertainty. My thesis is that the lack of accountability and transparency has led to a breakdown of trust between the people and those in power. If nothing changes, it is the special interest groups and bureaucrats who win, while the ordinary citizens are left to suffer the consequences of inaction and broken promises. The status quo benefits those who prioritize their own interests over the well-being of the community, and it is our responsibility to demand change and hold them accountable.

Primary source: Mother Jones
Cross-reference independently — do not take our word for it.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist uses AI-assisted reporting with web search. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Part of our Government Secrets coverage
See the full picture on our Government Secrets hub — including our ongoing coverage of declassification, whistleblowers, and government transparency.
How We Report Government Secrets

This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a declassified document, a FOIA release, an inspector general or congressional report, or a named whistleblower disclosure reported by outlets we cite) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it reports what the document or disclosure states and does not speculate about what remains classified beyond that. Part of our Government Secrets hub. Found an error? Tell us.

THE DAILY BRIEFING
Get the stories buried, spiked, or spun — free every morning.
No spam. No ads. Unsubscribe anytime.