The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
Surveillance State

Monaco Deploys Facial Recognition

Monaco has a network of 1,387 CCTV and facial recognition cameras monitored 24 hours a day

Monaco Deploys Facial Recognition

The principality of Monaco has deployed a network of 1,387 CCTV and facial recognition cameras, monitored 24 hours a day at an operational command and supervision center, as part of its efforts to increase security along its northern border with France, a move that has been underway since earlier this year, with the government spending millions of dollars on the project. This development has raised concerns about the potential impact on civil liberties, particularly in light of recent reports on Russia Spies On Europe, which highlight the risks of unchecked surveillance. The use of facial recognition technology is becoming increasingly widespread, with companies like Viettel AI developing innovative solutions, such as a patent for masked facial recognition, which can match the face biometrics of individuals wearing masks or with otherwise occluded faces.

The deployment of facial recognition cameras in Monaco is part of a broader trend towards the use of advanced security technologies, including autonomous robots and biometric access control, which are being adopted by businesses and governments around the world, as discussed in a recent article on facial recognition and autonomous security robots. According to a report by CNN, the government of Monaco is taking a multi-faceted approach to security, with random on-the-spot identity checks being carried out regularly, and over 134,000 such checks taking place last year, as reported on CNN. This approach has been effective in maintaining public safety, but it also raises important questions about the balance between security and individual privacy, particularly in light of recent developments such as the SCOTUS Rules On Geofencing decision.

The use of facial recognition technology is not without its challenges, and there are concerns about the potential for abuse, particularly in the context of AI Control Raises Concerns about the risks of relying on artificial intelligence systems to make decisions about public safety. As the use of facial recognition technology becomes more widespread, it is likely that these concerns will continue to grow, and it will be important for governments and businesses to carefully consider the potential implications of their actions. The development of new technologies, such as masked facial recognition, is likely to continue to drive the adoption of facial recognition systems, and it will be important to ensure that these systems are used in a way that respects individual privacy and civil liberties.

Marcus Webb
The Marcus Webb Take
Surveillance State & Tech Privacy

As I consider the recent deployment of facial recognition in Monaco, I firmly believe that this technology poses a significant threat to individual privacy and freedom. My thesis is that the unchecked use of facial recognition will inevitably lead to a surveillance state where citizens are constantly monitored and controlled. If nothing changes, it is the government and corporate interests that will win, as they will have unparalleled access to personal data and the ability to manipulate and influence the population. The people of Monaco, and indeed the world, must be vigilant and demand transparency and accountability to prevent this Orwellian nightmare from becoming a reality.

Primary source: CNN
Cross-reference independently — do not take our word for it.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist uses AI-assisted reporting with web search. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Part of our Surveillance State coverage
See the full picture on our Surveillance State hub — including our ongoing coverage of camera networks, warrantless spying, and facial recognition.
How We Report Surveillance State

This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a FOIA release, an agency's own policy or procurement document, court filings from surveillance litigation, or the wire reporting linked in the body) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it does not allege intent behind a surveillance program beyond what the record shows. Part of our Surveillance State hub. Found an error? Tell us.

THE DAILY BRIEFING
Get the stories buried, spiked, or spun — free every morning.
No spam. No ads. Unsubscribe anytime.