The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
Surveillance State

Secret Service Missed 102 Warnings

A watchdog report found the Secret Service missed 102 radio calls warning of a shooter at Trump's residence

Secret Service Missed 102 Warnings

A recent report from the DHS Office of Inspector General has revealed that the Secret Service missed 102 radio calls warning of a potential shooter, later identified as Thomas Crooks, who opened fire near President Trump's location, as reported by The Washington Times. The 64-page report, dated July 3, found that the Secret Service's communications room received only five phone calls and three text messages about Crooks in the hour before he opened fire, highlighting a significant gap in the agency's response to potential threats. This incident has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the Secret Service's communication protocols and its ability to respond to emergencies, prompting calls for increased Whistleblower Protections to encourage agents to come forward with information about potential security breaches.

The report's findings have sparked widespread criticism of the Secret Service's handling of the situation, with many questioning how such a critical failure could have occurred. According to the report, a counter-drone operator was still searching for the location of the American Glass Research building on Google when Crooks opened fire, further highlighting the agency's lack of preparedness. The incident has also led to renewed calls for greater transparency and accountability within the Secret Service, with some advocating for the agency to adopt more robust GSA Boosts Transparency measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The Secret Service's failure to respond to the warnings about Crooks has also raised questions about the agency's overall effectiveness in protecting the President and other high-ranking officials. As the justice.gov website notes, the Department of Justice has a range of initiatives in place to prevent and respond to violent crimes, but the Secret Service's handling of this incident suggests that more needs to be done to ensure public safety. Meanwhile, Congress Probes CIA Secrets and other intelligence agencies are facing scrutiny over their handling of classified information, highlighting the need for greater transparency and oversight across the intelligence community.

The investigation into the Secret Service's handling of the incident is ongoing, with lawmakers and watchdog groups calling for a full accounting of the agency's actions and a review of its communication protocols. As the US news from the Guardian and other outlets continue to report on the story, it remains to be seen what steps the Secret Service will take to address the concerns raised by this incident and prevent similar failures in the future.

Jordan Calloway
The Jordan Calloway Take
Government Secrets & FOIA

As I reflect on the recent revelation that the Secret Service missed 102 warnings, I am compelled to sound the alarm. My thesis is clear: the Secret Service's failure to act on these warnings is a stark reminder of the agency's glaring vulnerabilities. If nothing changes, the true winners will be those who seek to do harm to our nation's leaders and citizens. The perpetrators of threats and violence will be emboldened, knowing that their malicious intentions may go unchecked. It is imperative that we demand accountability and reform to prevent such catastrophic oversights from occurring in the future.

Primary source: The Washington Times
Cross-reference independently — do not take our word for it.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist uses AI-assisted reporting with web search. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Part of our Surveillance State coverage
See the full picture on our Surveillance State hub — including our ongoing coverage of camera networks, warrantless spying, and facial recognition.
How We Report Surveillance State

This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a FOIA release, an agency's own policy or procurement document, court filings from surveillance litigation, or the wire reporting linked in the body) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it does not allege intent behind a surveillance program beyond what the record shows. Part of our Surveillance State hub. Found an error? Tell us.

THE DAILY BRIEFING
Get the stories buried, spiked, or spun — free every morning.
No spam. No ads. Unsubscribe anytime.