The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
Tech & Privacy

US Govt Uses AI

US cyber agency CISA is using Anthropic's Mythos AI to scan federal code for security flaws

US Govt Uses AI

The US government has been utilizing artificial intelligence to enhance its cybersecurity measures, with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) deploying Anthropic's advanced AI model Mythos to scan government software repositories for vulnerabilities, as reported by US cyber agency using Anthropic's Mythos to audit government code. This move is part of a broader effort to identify and address potential security flaws in government code, with CISA's Attack Surface Evaluation team conducting audits to recognize bugs that could expose systems to foreign spies or cybercriminals. The use of AI in this context is seen as a significant step forward in the government's efforts to protect its digital infrastructure, and it is likely that other agencies will follow suit in the coming months.

The National Security Agency (NSA) has also been using Mythos since April, despite initial concerns and a rocky year with Washington, with analysts testing the AI model to identify potential security threats. This development is particularly noteworthy given the NSA's history of surveillance activities, including the reporting of NSA listing Merkel among leaders subject to surveillance in the past. The use of AI in surveillance and cybersecurity is a rapidly evolving field, with many experts pointing to the need for greater transparency and oversight in the development and deployment of these technologies. As the US government continues to invest in AI-powered cybersecurity measures, it is likely that we will see further developments in this area, including potential challenges to the use of these technologies in cases such as Flock Cameras facing SCOTUS.

The FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has also included provisions related to cyber and artificial intelligence, with Congress considering Cyber and Artificial Intelligence Provisions in the act. The use of AI in government agencies is not limited to cybersecurity, with other agencies such as NASA exploring the potential applications of AI in their operations. Meanwhile, the use of AI in other contexts, such as Dubai Airport using AI to enhance security and efficiency, is also becoming increasingly common. As the use of AI continues to expand, it is likely that we will see further developments in this area, including potential data breaches exposing biometrics and other sensitive information. The US government's use of Anthropic's Mythos AI model has been reported by Technology.org, highlighting the growing trend of AI adoption in government agencies.

Marcus Webb
The Marcus Webb Take
Surveillance State & Tech Privacy

As I reflect on the US government's increasing use of artificial intelligence, I firmly believe that this trend poses a significant threat to individual freedoms and transparency. My thesis is that the unchecked use of AI by the government will inevitably lead to a surveillance state where citizens' rights are compromised. If nothing changes, the winners will be large tech corporations and government agencies that prioritize power and control over accountability and privacy. They will reap the benefits of AI-driven efficiencies and data collection, while the average American citizen will be left to navigate a complex web of algorithms and biases that undermine their autonomy and dignity.

Primary source: Technology.org
Cross-reference independently — do not take our word for it.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist uses AI-assisted reporting with web search. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Part of our Tech & Privacy coverage
See the full picture on our Tech & Privacy hub — including our ongoing coverage of AI oversight and data privacy.
How We Report Tech & Privacy

This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a company's own disclosure, a security researcher's published findings, a regulator's filing (FTC, EU data-protection authorities), or a data-breach notification) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it is not security advice specific to your own devices or accounts, and does not verify a vendor's disputed claim beyond what the source states. Part of our Tech & Privacy hub. Found an error? Tell us.

THE DAILY BRIEFING
Get the stories buried, spiked, or spun — free every morning.
No spam. No ads. Unsubscribe anytime.