The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
Tech & Privacy

Reddit scum re-enabled "Ads off Reddit"

PSA: even if you disabled it before, check your settings -> privacy -> "Ads off RedditAllow Reddit to measure Reddit paid marketing campaigns on other sites and apps." These low-life scumbags re-enabled it again. &;
Share
Reddit scum re-enabled 'Ads off Reddit'

What they're not telling you: REDDIT RE-ENABLED CROSS-SITE TRACKING WITHOUT USER CONSENT—AGAIN Reddit has systematically re-enabled a cross-site advertising tracking toggle in user privacy settings after users disabled it, forcing individuals to manually opt-out a second time from data collection practices the platform had previously acknowledged as optional. The mechanism operates through a setting labeled "Allow Reddit to measure Reddit paid marketing campaigns on other sites and apps," located in Settings > Privacy. Documentation from Reddit users indicates the toggle defaults to enabled, and crucially, reverts to enabled status even after users have explicitly disabled it.

What the Documents Show

This is not a system malfunction—it represents a deliberate reset of user-selected privacy preferences without notification or consent. The tracking data Reddit collects through this mechanism includes user browsing behavior across the broader internet, not limited to Reddit's own properties. When enabled, Reddit's measurement pixel fires on external websites and applications where Reddit has placed paid advertising, creating a cross-site behavioral profile tied to individual user accounts. This data feeds Reddit's advertising optimization systems and is shared with third-party data brokers through standard programmatic advertising channels. Reddit's parent company Advance Publications has not publicly disclosed why the toggle was re-enabled across user accounts, nor has the company issued guidance on whether this represents intentional policy or technical error.

🔎 Mainstream angle
The corporate press either ignored this story entirely or buried it in a 3-sentence brief. The framing, when it appeared at all, focused on process rather than impact.

Follow the Money

The distinction matters legally. Under the Federal Trade Commission's standards for unfair or deceptive practices, persistent re-enablement of disabled privacy settings can constitute deception regardless of stated intent. The FTC has precedent here: in 2020, the agency settled with Amazon Ring for similar patterns of resetting privacy defaults without consent, fining the company $5.8 million. What makes Reddit's implementation particularly significant is the architecture of the reset mechanism itself. Rather than treating user-selected privacy settings as persistent data stored in user accounts, Reddit's system appears to treat disabled tracking as a temporary state. Each system update or account refresh cycle appears to reset the toggle to its default enabled position.

What Else We Know

This creates what privacy researchers call a "dark pattern"—a deliberately frustrating user interface that channels users toward data-sharing behavior. The broader context reveals this is not isolated. Major platforms—Facebook, Google, TikTok, Amazon—employ similar toggles with documented patterns of re-enabling or obscuring them. What's changed is Reddit's explicit re-engagement of users who had already made a choice. This requires active intervention: the company had to identify accounts where the toggle was disabled and reset it. That's not passive infrastructure.

Primary Sources

What are they not saying?
Who benefits from this story staying buried? Follow the regulatory filings, the court dockets, and the FOIA releases. The truth is in the paperwork — it always is.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist aggregates from public records, API feeds (Federal Register, CourtListener, MuckRock, Hacker News), and independent media. AI-assisted synthesis. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Share
Part of our Tech & Privacy coverage
See the full picture on our Tech & Privacy hub — including our ongoing coverage of AI oversight and data privacy.
How We Report Tech & Privacy

This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a company's own disclosure, a security researcher's published findings, a regulator's filing (FTC, EU data-protection authorities), or a data-breach notification) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it is not security advice specific to your own devices or accounts, and does not verify a vendor's disputed claim beyond what the source states. Part of our Tech & Privacy hub. Found an error? Tell us.