Surveillance State
Why do most countries that implement "Age Verification" rules never reflect on hacking in Indonesia?
Considering that many countries are trying to create social media regulations for those under 16 and are experiencing hacking at the wrong time, I think most State government have forgotten how private or important data is get hacked in Indonesia. submitted by
What they're not telling you: Considering that many countries are trying to create social media regulations for those under 16 and are experiencing hacking at the wrong time, I think most State government have forgotten how private or important data is get hacked in Indonesia.

The Take
Marcus Webb · Surveillance & Tech Privacy
# THE TAKE: Age Verification Theatre Ignores the Indonesia Precedent
Most governments pushing age verification mandates are structurally incapable of learning from Indonesia's 2022 catastrophe—when their national ID database leaked 4.7 billion records. Why? Because admission requires acknowledging what they won't: centralized identity verification systems are honeypots, full stop.
The UK's Online Safety Bill, Australia's eSafety measures, and EU proposals all demand age gates tied to government ID databases or payment systems. Each creates exactly what happened in Jakarta: a single target containing the biometric/financial data of millions of minors.
State governments implementing these frameworks aren't ignoring Indonesia through negligence. They're ignoring it deliberately. The architecture serves surveillance infrastructure deployment more than child protection. A genuinely concerned regulator would mandate *federated* verification or accept anonymous browsing. Instead, we get centralized databases—the only outcome governments actually want.
The hacks aren't coming. They're already here.
What the Documents Show
This story originates from r/privacy. The details have received minimal coverage from major outlets — which should tell you something. surveillance-state news is at the center of what's emerging.
🔎 Mainstream angle: The corporate press either ignored this story entirely or buried it in a 3-sentence brief. The framing, when it appeared at all, focused on process rather than impact.
Primary Sources
What are they not saying? Who benefits from this story staying buried? Follow the regulatory filings, the court dockets, and the
FOIA releases. The truth is in the paperwork — it always is.
Disclosure: NewsAnarchist aggregates from public records, API feeds (Federal Register, CourtListener, MuckRock, Hacker News), and independent media. AI-assisted synthesis. Always verify primary sources linked above.