What they're not telling you: Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times, Voting rights groups filed a lawsuit on April 21 seeking to block the Department of Justice (DOJ) from collecting, compiling, and analyzing state voter registration lists. As of April 1, the DOJ has sued 30 states, including Washington, for failing to turn over voter rolls. The department has said the U.S.
# THE TAKE The voting rights crowd just sued to *prevent* transparency. Read that again. They're blocking DOJ requests for voter rolls—public records in most states—claiming privacy concerns that don't exist under NVRA precedent. The actual mechanism: fear that demographic data becomes a targeting tool. Fine. They're not wrong about *that*. But their solution—lawsuit opacity instead of statutory guardrails—is precisely backward. You don't kill information flows; you build legal architecture around them. The DOJ under any administration will eventually get these lists anyway. FOIA litigation takes years. What these groups actually want: plausible deniability that their favored party can't access the same data the other side will inevitably obtain. If the data's dangerous to collect, it's dangerous to vote on. If it's safe, demand disclosure requirements instead of suppression. They're choosing secrecy over accountability. Classic move.
What the Documents Show
attorney general has congressional authority under the Civil Rights Act of 1960 to seek election records from states to check for improper voter registrations. The groups filed a complaint on April 21, accusing the DOJ of seeking to use the sensitive data to build what they described as a “sprawling new voter surveillance and purging apparatus” without congressional authorization. The complaint alleges that the department attempted to usurp states’ authority to oversee election administration and impose its own “secretive ’verification procedures’” to identify ineligible voters. “Never before has a federal-death-penalty.html" title="DOJ Re-Adopts Executions By Firing Squad As It Strengthens Federal Death Penalty" style="color:#1a1a1a;text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:dotted;font-weight:500;">federal agency centralized this volume of Americans’ voting data in a single system of records,” it stated. “And in doing so, DOJ has flouted statutory safeguards designed to ensure transparency and public participation in the federal government’s collection of Americans’ personal information.” The lawsuit was filed in the U.S.
Follow the Money
District Court for the District of Columbia by advocacy group Common Cause and four individual members of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The data requested by the DOJ includes voters’ Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, dates of birth, home addresses, political party affiliations, and voter participation history, according to the filing. The groups are seeking a court order requiring the DOJ to delete any voter rolls it has obtained from states and to bar the department from compiling or disclosing voter data. Dhillon, assistant attorney general of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, said on April 1 that the department has a duty to ensure state compliance with election laws. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon speaks during a news conference at the Justice Department in Washington on Sept. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images “The Justice Department will continue to fulfill its oversight role dutifully, neutrally, and transparently wherever Americans vote in federal elections,” Dhillon said in a statement “Many state election officials, however, are choosing to fight us in court rather than show their work.
What Else We Know
We will continue to verify that all States are carrying out critical election integrity legal duties.” Dhillon added that the Civil Rights Act allows the attorney general to “demand the production, inspection, and analysis of statewide voter registration lists that can be cross-checked effectively.” In an April 21 statement, Common Cause CEO Virginia Kase Solomon said the DOJ’s efforts to collect voter rolls amount to “a blatant, partisan power grab.” “By attempting to interrogate and exploit voter data for political purposes, President Trump’s DOJ isn’t just threatening the privacy of every American—they are building a system designed to imprison the ballot box and silence millions of eligible voters,” Solomon said. The Epoch Times has reached out to the DOJ for comment, but did not receive a response by publication time. Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide It would be very wise of you to study our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure . Here's our Cookie Policy .
Primary Sources
- Source: ZeroHedge
- Category: Surveillance State
- Cross-reference independently — don't take our word for it.
Disclosure: NewsAnarchist aggregates from public records, API feeds (Federal Register, CourtListener, MuckRock, Hacker News), and independent media. AI-assisted synthesis. Always verify primary sources linked above.