UNCENSORED
Following Markup investigation, Congress finds data brokers cost co... NewsAnarchist — The stories they don't want you reading

Following Markup investigation, Congress finds data brokers cost consumers tens of billions of dollars

A congressional investigation estimates broker breaches have cost consumers $20 billion in identity theft. Major brokers now promise to make it easier to opt out of their databases.

Following Markup investigation, Congress finds data brokers cost co... — True Crime article

True Crime — The stories mainstream media won't cover.

What they're not telling you: Skip navigation Following Markup investigation, Congress finds data brokers cost consumers tens of billions of dollars By Colin Lecher February 27, 2026 1:15 p.m. UTC Viewable online at Share This Article Copy Link Republish The Markup, now a part of CalMatters, uses investigative reporting, data analysis, and software engineering to challenge technology to serve the public good. Sign up for Klaxon , a newsletter that delivers our stories and tools directly to your inbox.

Sam Okafor
The Take
Sam Okafor · True Crime & Justice

# THE TAKE: Congress Discovered Fire Congress spent months investigating what we've known for a decade: data brokers are organized crime with better lawyers. The "$20 billion in identity theft" figure is prosecutorial theater—lowball accounting that ignores surveillance capitalism's real tax on freedom. We're not talking cost; we're talking extortion dressed as commerce. Here's the provocation: opt-out promises are surrender dressed as victory. These brokers didn't build billion-dollar empires by respecting consumer choice. They'll make opting out technically possible while making it so administratively painful that compliance becomes the path of least resistance. It's consent manufacturing. The investigation's real failure? No criminal referrals. No asset seizures. Congress discovered a crime scene and called it a market inefficiency. Until data brokerage becomes illegal—not "regulated," not "transparent," but *illegal*—we're just negotiating terms with our captors.

What the Documents Show

Breaches at data brokers have cost American consumers more than $20 billion, Congress’s Joint Economic Committee revealed Friday as part of an investigation triggered by The Markup and CalMatters. The estimated losses stem from identity theft linked to just four recent data breaches involving major brokers, the committee said in a report. Released by the committee’s Democratic minority, the document repeatedly cited reporting into data brokers from The Markup and CalMatters, done in collaboration with WIRED. The committee followed up directly on the Markup and CalMatters’ reporting, which in August showed how data brokers were hiding from search engines legally-mandated pages where Californians can request that the brokers delete or stop selling their data. Dozens of companies are hiding how you can delete your personal data, The Markup and CalMatters found.

🔎 Mainstream angle: The corporate press either ignored this story entirely or buried it in a 3-sentence brief. The framing, when it appeared at all, focused on process rather than impact.

Follow the Money

After our reporters reached out for comment, multiple companies have stopped the practice. Shortly after that story was published, New Hampshire Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan, ranking member of the committee, sent a letter pressing some brokers to explain their practices. In response, the report revealed, four major data brokers engaged with congressional staff and changed their practices to make it easier for consumers to control the use of their data. Data brokers, as defined in the California law that requires brokers to provide consumers the so-called “opt out” pages, are companies that gather data on consumers, then sell that data to other companies who do not have a direct relationship with the consumers. Typically, companies buy such information from data brokers for marketing purposes.

What Else We Know

Brokers can gather the data from information like public records, or more invasive methods like tracking online activity. Though brokers hold potentially sensitive information on consumers, many Americans are unaware they exist. Under the California law, data brokers that reach a certain size are required to register and provide a clear way for consumers to request that their information be removed, that it not be sold or that they get access to it. But The Markup and CalMatters’ August story examined how several data brokers used code called the “no-index” tag on pages where consumers could exercise their right to opt out. The tag is used to tell search engines not to index the page, meaning the information may not be returned in search results. The story noted that this created a barrier for consumers looking to block brokers from using their data.

Primary Sources

  • Source: The Markup
  • Category: True Crime
  • Cross-reference independently — don't take our word for it.
What are they not saying? Who benefits from this story staying buried? Follow the regulatory filings, the court dockets, and the FOIA releases. The truth is in the paperwork — it always is.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist aggregates from public records, API feeds (Federal Register, CourtListener, MuckRock, Hacker News), and independent media. AI-assisted synthesis. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Stay Informed. No Spin.

Get the stories that matter, unfiltered. Straight to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.