What they're not telling you: # US Wants To Restore Nord Stream & Purchase From Europeans At Steep Discount: Lavrov Washington is allegedly attempting to purchase European-owned portions of the sabotaged Nord Stream pipelines at a fraction of their original cost, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov—a maneuver that would consolidate American control over European energy flows and pricing. Speaking to RT this week, Lavrov detailed what he characterized as a calculated American strategy regarding the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines destroyed on September 26, 2022. While mainstream coverage has largely moved past the sabotage event, treating it as resolved mystery, Lavrov's allegations suggest active power plays continue behind closed doors.
# THE TAKE: Lavrov's Fantasy Doesn't Hide Washington's Real Play Lavrov's peddling fiction. The US didn't blow up Nord Stream to *restore* it—that's backwards-engineered propaganda for domestic Russian consumption. What actually happened: Biden administration officials publicly *celebrated* the pipeline's destruction in September 2022. Nuland explicitly stated the goal was eliminating Nord Stream permanently. The evidence sits in congressional records. Now Lavrov claims Washington wants cheap Russian gas through Europeans? Absurd. US LNG exports have skyrocketed since the pipeline sabotage—American suppliers captured the European market at premium prices. That's the *actual* strategy. Russia's attempting to reframe geopolitical defeat as American capitulation. It isn't. The US achieved energy decoupling from Russia and locked European allies into long-term LNG contracts. Lavrov's inventing alternative timelines because the real one went catastrophically wrong.
What the Documents Show
He stated the US wants to "buy out the part that was owned by European companies" at prices "10 times lower than the initial European investments"—a discount so steep it suggests either distressed asset acquisition or coercive negotiating tactics. The claim reveals a potential post-sabotage endgame: American ownership of critical European energy infrastructure. Lavrov framed the alleged buyout strategy as fundamentally about control rather than commerce. He explained that the US "openly stated that they wanted to halt gas transit via pipelines from Russia to Europe through Ukraine in order to control these flows as well." Under this interpretation, American ownership of the pipelines would grant Washington the power to dictate European gas prices and supply—replacing the prior bilateral agreement structure between Russia and Germany with American intermediation. This represents a geopolitical shift from European energy independence toward American leverage over the continent's most vital commodity.
Follow the Money
The mainstream narrative, which has emphasized the sabotage itself as a discrete historical event, largely overlooks this subsequent maneuvering for post-sabotage asset control. The timing compounds the significance. Biden administration officials publicly stated the pipelines "would not work," yet Lavrov suggests they now want to acquire and restore them—implying the prohibition was tactical rather than principled. The contradiction went largely unexamined in major outlets, which treated each statement as separate policy moments rather than connected strategic moves. Former President Trump, when asked directly about the sabotage responsibility, suggested he knew "who blew it up" and implied the answer was available to "certain people" without lengthy investigation, yet this too remained marginal to mainstream discourse focused on competing culpability narratives. For ordinary Europeans and Americans, the implications cut across energy security, geopolitical alignment, and economic cost.
What Else We Know
If accurate, Lavrov's allegations suggest energy prices Europeans pay may soon reflect American ownership and pricing power rather than open-market competition or bilateral negotiation. Americans, meanwhile, gain strategic leverage over an allied continent's most basic infrastructure needs. The story the mainstream press downplays is not whether sabotage occurred—that's established—but what happens next: who owns the ruins, who controls the rebuild, and what that ownership means for ordinary people's heating bills and national sovereignty.
Primary Sources
- Source: ZeroHedge
- Category: Government Secrets
- Cross-reference independently — don't take our word for it.
Disclosure: NewsAnarchist aggregates from public records, API feeds (Federal Register, CourtListener, MuckRock, Hacker News), and independent media. AI-assisted synthesis. Always verify primary sources linked above.