The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
Surveillance State

DOJ Launches Criminal Probe Into E. Jean Carroll Over Alleged Perjury In Trump Lawsuits

Share
DOJ Launches Criminal Probe Into E. Jean Carroll Over Alleged Perjury In Trump Lawsuits

What they're not telling you: DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll Over Sworn Statement on Legal Funding Sources The Department of Justice's Criminal Division has initiated a formal investigation into E. Jean Carroll's October 2022 deposition testimony regarding the sources of her legal funding in civil cases against former President Donald Trump, according to records reviewed by CBS News.

What the Documents Show

The investigation centers on a discrepancy between Carroll's sworn statement and subsequent disclosures. During her October 2022 deposition conducted by Trump's legal team, Carroll testified under oath that she was operating under a contingency arrangement with her attorneys and that no outside parties were funding her litigation. In April 2023, approximately six months later, her legal team disclosed that American Future Republic—a nonprofit entity substantially funded by LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman—had provided financial support for her cases. Carroll's counsel characterized the omission as an administrative oversight rather than intentional misrepresentation. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois is handling the probe.

🔎 Mainstream angle
The corporate press either ignored this story entirely or buried it in a 3-sentence brief. The framing, when it appeared at all, focused on process rather than impact.

Follow the Money

Andrew Boutros, a Trump appointee who leads that office, has been assigned to oversee the investigation. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has recused himself from the matter. No charges have been filed, and the investigation remains in its preliminary phase. The factual sequence matters here. Carroll won two civil judgments against Trump: one verdict of approximately $83 million in May 2024 for defamation and battery, and a second finding of liability in January 2024 for sexual abuse. Trump has appealed both outcomes and continues to deny all allegations.

What Else We Know

The funding source issue emerged not through independent oversight but through mandatory legal disclosure procedures that required Carroll's team to reveal the American Future Republic arrangement. Reid Hoffman's involvement adds a documented institutional angle. Public records show Hoffman has contributed over $100 million to Democratic causes and political organizations since 2020. His decision to fund Carroll's legal defense was not concealed—Hoffman publicly stated his rationale: ensuring that an individual plaintiff could afford litigation against a defendant with substantially greater resources. American Future Republic, the nonprofit vehicle for this support, functions as a litigation-funding mechanism and has financed other cases involving Trump-related defendants and accusers. The precise dollar amount transferred from American Future Republic to Carroll's legal team has not been disclosed in available source material.

Primary Sources

What are they not saying?
Who benefits from this story staying buried? Follow the regulatory filings, the court dockets, and the FOIA releases. The truth is in the paperwork — it always is.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist aggregates from public records, API feeds (Federal Register, CourtListener, MuckRock, Hacker News), and independent media. AI-assisted synthesis. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Share
Part of our Corporate Watchdog coverage
See the full picture on our Corporate Watchdog hub — including our ongoing coverage of antitrust enforcement and corporate accountability.
How We Report Corporate Watchdog

This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a regulator's enforcement action (SEC, FTC, DOJ), a company's own SEC filing, a court record, or the wire/trade-press reporting linked in the body) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it is not a recommendation about any company's stock or products, and does not verify a company's disputed denial beyond what the record shows. Part of our Corporate Watchdog hub. Found an error? Tell us.