Ellisons Sued Over Paramount-WB Deal
Paramount shareholder alleges David and Larry Ellison cut an illegal deal with Trump for US approval
A lawsuit has been filed against David Ellison and his father Larry Ellison, alleging they made an illegal deal with President Donald Trump to secure US governmental approval for the takeover of Warner Bros, as reported by Variety. The plaintiff, a Paramount shareholder, claims this side deal was corrupt and has led to the current antitrust lawsuit. This development is the latest in a series of challenges facing the proposed Paramount-Warner Bros merger, which has also been criticized by the Writers Guild of America, who have filed their own antitrust lawsuit against Paramount, alleging the merger would result in fewer jobs and lower pay for writers, according to the Los Angeles Times.
The Federal Trade Commission has been actively involved in antitrust cases recently, including a major settlement with Caremark, as announced on the FTC website, which resolved allegations of anticompetitive and unfair rebating practices. This increased scrutiny of corporate mergers and acquisitions is also reflected in the Paramount-Warner Bros merger faces new antitrust challenges, with many experts predicting a long and difficult road ahead for the deal. California and 11 other states have also filed a lawsuit to block the merger, citing concerns over the impact on competition and the creative community.
The cost of litigation for these cases is expected to be high, with California Attorney General Rob Bonta estimating the cost at $20 million, as the state prepares to take on the expensive task of hiring lawyers and specialized economists and antitrust experts. This is a significant burden for state prosecutors, who often rely on the Justice Department for support, but in this case, are going it alone, much like the FTC warns of AI scams, ramps up enforcement in their efforts to protect consumers. Meanwhile, Paramount CEO David Ellison's camp has been pushing for the studio to move out of California, amid the growing backlash against the merger.
The lawsuit filed by the states is set to be heard by U.S. District Judge P. Casey Pitts, who will consider an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order, in an effort to block the deal. This is just the latest development in a long and complex saga, which has also seen the Covid fraud gang steals hundreds of thousands of dollars, highlighting the need for increased scrutiny of corporate dealings and the importance of antitrust enforcement. As the case continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether the merger will be allowed to proceed, or if the growing opposition will ultimately prove too great to overcome.
As I reflect on the recent lawsuit against the Ellisons over the Paramount-WB deal, I firmly believe that the lack of transparency and accountability in this merger will ultimately harm consumers. If nothing changes, the major studios will win, consolidating their power and limiting consumer choice. The Ellisons and other corporate interests will reap the benefits, while the average viewer will be left with fewer options and higher prices. It's imperative that we demand more oversight and regulation to prevent this monopolistic behavior, ensuring a fair and competitive market that benefits everyone, not just the wealthy elite.
Cross-reference independently — do not take our word for it.
Disclosure: NewsAnarchist uses AI-assisted reporting with web search. Always verify primary sources linked above.
This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a declassified document, a FOIA release, an inspector general or congressional report, or a named whistleblower disclosure reported by outlets we cite) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it reports what the document or disclosure states and does not speculate about what remains classified beyond that. Part of our Government Secrets hub. Found an error? Tell us.