The stories buried, spiked, or spun.
Surveillance State

US Expands Facial Recognition Use

New contracts and deployments signal growing reliance on facial recognition technology

US Expands Facial Recognition Use

The US government is expanding its use of facial recognition technology, with a recent contract award for a facial recognition platform, as reported by Biometric Update, indicating a potential completion date of March 31, 2026. This development comes as part of a broader trend of increased investment in biometric technologies, with companies like ROC Watch receiving new liability protections with a DHS DT&E designation, enabling the use of AI-enabled video analytics for threat detection and facial recognition.

The expansion of facial recognition technology is not limited to the US, as evidenced by a recent deployment of outdoor facial recognition cameras in a Tokyo ward, as reported by idtechwire.com, to help find missing children and elderly people with dementia. This move has raised concerns about the potential for widespread surveillance and the impact on individual privacy, particularly in light of recent controversies surrounding the use of facial recognition technology by companies like Meta, which has faced backlash over its plans to integrate facial recognition capabilities into its products, with some people expressing fear about the potential for abuse and surveillance, as noted in a report on pervert glasses.

In the US, the use of facial recognition technology is also being driven by regulatory developments, such as the mandate for cameras in new cars, which has been implemented in the EU and is being considered in the US, with a funded law and ongoing discussions about the implementation of such technology, as reported by autonocion.com. Meanwhile, law enforcement agencies are increasingly using facial recognition technology, with the WA police scanning faces in public, raising concerns about the lack of governance and oversight, as noted by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, which administers the Privacy Act.

The growing use of facial recognition technology has significant implications for individual privacy and civil liberties, and raises important questions about the need for responsible governance and oversight, as discussed in recent articles on warrantless surveillance programs and the importance of NSA guidance on router hygiene. Furthermore, the decision by the LAPD to drop its Flock surveillance contract highlights the ongoing debate about the use of surveillance technology and the need for transparency and accountability.

Marcus Webb
The Marcus Webb Take
Surveillance State & Tech Privacy

As I reflect on the US expanding its use of facial recognition technology, I firmly believe that this trend poses a significant threat to our civil liberties. My thesis is that the unchecked growth of facial recognition will erode our right to privacy and create a surveillance state. If nothing changes, the winners will be government agencies and corporations that seek to exploit this technology for their own interests, such as law enforcement and tech giants like Amazon and Microsoft. They will reap the benefits of increased power and profits, while the average citizen will be left to navigate a landscape of diminished privacy and increased scrutiny.

Primary source: Biometric Update
Cross-reference independently — do not take our word for it.

Disclosure: NewsAnarchist uses AI-assisted reporting with web search. Always verify primary sources linked above.

Part of our Surveillance State coverage
See the full picture on our Surveillance State hub — including our ongoing coverage of camera networks, warrantless spying, and facial recognition.
How We Report Surveillance State

This article is produced by NewsAnarchist's AI reporting system, not a human staff reporter. It's built from the primary source cited above (a FOIA release, an agency's own policy or procurement document, court filings from surveillance litigation, or the wire reporting linked in the body) and reports what that source states, attributed to it — it does not allege intent behind a surveillance program beyond what the record shows. Part of our Surveillance State hub. Found an error? Tell us.

THE DAILY BRIEFING
Get the stories buried, spiked, or spun — free every morning.
No spam. No ads. Unsubscribe anytime.